Math-Whizz Blog

Balancing Innovation and Accountability in Schools

August 19th, 2011 by kevin

The conversations around standardized tests, raising student achievement, and implementing technology are a constant with administrators, teachers, education policy makers and even parents.   The article “Schools Struggle to Balance Digital Innovation, Academic Accountability” by Michelle R. Davis does a great job presenting the struggles educators have between the focus on implementing state and national standards, keeping your test scores up and implementing technology in your school.  She provides some great insight into the steps we can take to balance the risk reward of implementing new technology.   While this article appeared in the June 15th edition of EdWeek, I thought revisiting it as the school year beings would be appropriate.

Ms. Davis’ article is much more thorough, but here’s a summary of what she has to say:

  1. Create policies that encourage innovation while maintaining reasonable accountability. Be careful with punishments for taking risks because you can’t get big rewards without taking big risks.
  2. “Maintaining a bad situation” or fear of failure is not a reason to stay put.  Davis cites the example of Christopher Dede, who poses, “If a hospital with a high death rate refused to try new, modern practices because they’d be unsure of the outcome or there might be a learning curve, people would be upset.”
  3. Relevant tools and materials WILL increase student engagement over time and your scores are more likely to increase.
  4. Use the “80 Percent rule” presented by Kathy Onarheim.  Technology changes too rapidly to wait for scientifically research-based evidence, which can take years to collect and sift through so if you are 80% sure of something, move forward.
  5. Utilize faster research tactics.  Davis quotes Tom Vander Ark as saying, “Instead of randomized long-term control trials, we can use rapid short-cycle control trials.  You can get good results in three hours and not three years.”
  6. Not every technology innovation translates into higher scores – sometimes you just have to do it because it’s the right thing to do.
  7. Move beyond test scores and use technology to help students learn better and help teachers teach better.  It has to be about teaching and learning.

I hope you find this consolidation helpful.  It would be my bullet list when implementing technology. 

About the Author: Kevin Judd taught mathematics for 13 years before spending 5 years as a math specialist and curriculum administrator.  He holds a Master’s Degree in Educational Policy Studies and has also consulted with schools on ways to reform mathematics curriculum and instruction for students.  He is a frequent conference speaker on the topic of aligning math instruction to research on how students learn.

If you are interested in engaging and motivating your kids in authentic learning for math, give Math-Whizz a try. For a free trial, check out www.whizz.us.

Personalized Learning

March 9th, 2011 by ben

Over the last three decades a consistent pattern has emerged.  Despite huge spending in education, American and Brittish students are losing ground on their peers in other countries, especially in Math and Science.  Both countries, whose education systems were once envied and copied the world over, have been looking for ways to arrest this slide and once again become the leading light in the teaching of Math and Science. 

Personalized Learning in schools has been championed by governments from all around the globe.  They understand that it is unreasonable for a teacher to be able to teach to the specific strengths and weaknesses of every student, but feel that by combining their efforts in the classroom with the technology that is now readily available; each student can be delivered a unique and highly effective learning experience.  One person who has been outspoken in his support for Personalized Learning, and knows a thing or two about technology and education through his commercial and charitable lives, is Bill Gates.  In a recent radio interview he talked about how over the last 20 to 30 years “…our achievement has been pretty flat while other countries have managed to improve their achievement.”  Specifically talking about using technology to help students who are struggling, Gates goes on to say that “…when you have a kid who’s behind in math, identifying exactly what they are missing and drilling in on that, we have not incorporated that into the education system”.  Yet.  Bill Gates, governments, school administrators, teachers, parents and publishers all see that this is the direction we need to go in and yet all the signs are there of making exactly the same mistakes that have been made in the past. 

Money has been and will continue to be made available for schools to buy products that provide personalized instruction. Schools will be told that they need to incorporate these products into their teaching.  The market will continue to be flooded with products that claim to provide personalized instruction.  Schools, understandably, will find it hard to pick from all the products offered and either go with the big publisher they trust that provides all their text books or choose the cheapest offering that gets the administrators off their back.  Ten years from now there will be no improvement in math scores.

Why will this happen? 

Read the rest of this entry »

Math and Chinese – a match made in the classroom

April 6th, 2010 by admin

The Seattle Times reports on a teaching method growing in popularity in the city’s elementary classrooms – teaching math with Chinese or Spanish.

Learning math with chinese - a successful approach in seattle classrooms

Learning math with chinese - a successful tactic in Seattle classrooms

The Seattle Times looks at some first grade students being taught basic math and science entirely in Mandarin Chinese, despite the children’s almost universal unfamiliarity with the language, in a seemingly successful attempt to boost both language and math skills.

At Beacon Hill International School, many students learn a second language along with their ABCs by spending half of each school day immersed in Mandarin Chinese or Spanish….

…In the afternoon, these students will move to another classroom to study reading, writing and social studies in English. But in the morning, they learn math and science in Mandarin, picking up the language through repetition and physical cues from Wu.

The approach seems to work despite (or even thanks to) the students’ split learning demands, relying on the basic qualities of elementary math and sciences, and the natural propensity of young children to acquire languages.

Beacon Hill International’s teachers hope the two-language approach will lead to academic gains for all their students, especially the school’s many immigrant children, who often fall behind academically while they still are learning English.

There’s research to bolster that hope. At John Stanford, for example, the school compared students in its first Spanish-English class with those who were one grade ahead and taught only in English. On the state’s fourth-grade test, the children in the Spanish-English program scored about 20 percentile points higher in reading and math.

And there are signs that the approach also helps boost confidence.

A similar approach at a Scottish school saw students’ math grades improving when they learned the subject.

You can sort of see how this might work when you look at kindergarten and first-grade math (including the material we teach in our online tutoring at Math-Whizz) – early math deals a lot in the language of number and basic techniques of describing the world in numeric terms.

Learning English or Chinese or Spanish words for numbers to ten, or comparative measures, might be somewhat irrelevant – the key is that the children form the concepts effectively and learn them well. There might be no better mnemonic hooks for basic math than sing-song Chinese and Spanish. There are likely many other reasons for this that I could guess at, but I’ll leave that to the experts.

These stories demonstrate that we underestimate children’s learning potential at our peril, and that sometimes stretching kids in novel ways has some surprising knock-on effects, and that is something we know well at Math-Whizz

Variety of media and methods help with math

June 2nd, 2009 by admin

Some interesting educational research findings from ScienceDaily, and reported over at the UK Whizz Blog.

Summarized for your reading pleasure:

Learning with different mathematical methods, using old and new media, and with a teacher to tie it all together, gets the best results.

And so you have it! Math-Whizz has a huge variety of material, encourages pencil-and-paper methods, and facilitates parent-student-teacher communication. A no-brainer.


Archives